html=History%5Bedit%20source%5D%0AMain%20article%3A%20History%20of%20Wikipedia%0A%0A%0AJimmy%20Wales%20and%20Larry%20Sanger%0ANupedia%5Bedit%20source%5D%0ALogo%20reading%20%22Nupedia.com%20the%20free%20encyclopedia%22%20in%20blue%20with%20large%20initial%20%22N%22%0AWikipedia%20originally%20developed%20from%20another%20encyclopedia%20project%20called%20Nupedia%0AOther%20collaborative%20online%20encyclopedias%20were%20attempted%20before%20Wikipedia%2C%20but%20none%20were%20as%20successful.%5B23%5D%0A%0AWikipedia%20began%20as%20a%20complementary%20project%20for%20Nupedia%2C%20a%20free%20online%20English-language%20encyclopedia%20project%20whose%20articles%20were%20written%20by%20experts%20and%20reviewed%20under%20a%20formal%20process.%5B11%5D%20Nupedia%20was%20founded%20on%20March%209%2C%202000%2C%20under%20the%20ownership%20of%20Bomis%2C%20a%20web%20portal%20company.%20Its%20main%20figures%20were%20Jimmy%20Wales%2C%20the%20CEO%20of%20Bomis%2C%20and%20Larry%20Sanger%2C%20editor-in-chief%20for%20Nupedia%20and%20later%20Wikipedia.%20Nupedia%20was%20licensed%20initially%20under%20its%20own%20Nupedia%20Open%20Content%20License%2C%20switching%20to%20the%20GNU%20Free%20Documentation%20License%20before%20Wikipedia%27s%20founding%20at%20the%20urging%20of%20Richard%20Stallman.%5B24%5D%20Sanger%20and%20Wales%20founded%20Wikipedia.%5B25%5D%5B26%5D%20While%20Wales%20is%20credited%20with%20defining%20the%20goal%20of%20making%20a%20publicly%20editable%20encyclopedia%2C%5B27%5D%5B28%5D%20Sanger%20is%20credited%20with%20the%20strategy%20of%20using%20a%20wiki%20to%20reach%20that%20goal.%5B29%5D%20On%20January%2010%2C%202001%2C%20Sanger%20proposed%20on%20the%20Nupedia%20mailing%20list%20to%20create%20a%20wiki%20as%20a%20%22feeder%22%20project%20for%20Nupedia.%5B30%5D%0A%0AExternal%20audio%0A%20The%20Great%20Book%20of%20Knowledge%2C%20Part%201%2C%20Ideas%20with%20Paul%20Kennedy%2C%20CBC%2C%20January%2015%2C%202014%0ALaunch%20and%20early%20growth%5Bedit%20source%5D%0AWikipedia%20was%20launched%20on%20January%2015%2C%202001%2C%20as%20a%20single%20English-language%20edition%20at%20www.wikipedia.com%2C%5B31%5D%20and%20announced%20by%20Sanger%20on%20the%20Nupedia%20mailing%20list.%5B27%5D%20Wikipedia%27s%20policy%20of%20%22neutral%20point-of-view%22%5B32%5D%20was%20codified%20in%20its%20first%20months.%20Otherwise%2C%20there%20were%20relatively%20few%20rules%20initially%20and%20Wikipedia%20operated%20independently%20of%20Nupedia.%5B27%5D%20Originally%2C%20Bomis%20intended%20to%20make%20Wikipedia%20a%20business%20for%20profit.%5B33%5D%0A%0AWikipedia%20gained%20early%20contributors%20from%20Nupedia%2C%20Slashdot%20postings%2C%20and%20web%20search%20engine%20indexing.%20By%20August%208%2C%202001%2C%20Wikipedia%20had%20over%208%2C000%20articles.%5B34%5D%20On%20September%2025%2C%202001%2C%20Wikipedia%20had%20over%2013%2C000%20articles.%5B35%5D%20By%20the%20end%20of%202001%2C%20it%20had%20grown%20to%20approximately%2020%2C000%20articles%20and%2018%20language%20editions.%20It%20had%20reached%2026%20language%20editions%20by%20late%202002%2C%2046%20by%20the%20end%20of%202003%2C%20and%20161%20by%20the%20final%20days%20of%202004.%5B36%5D%20Nupedia%20and%20Wikipedia%20coexisted%20until%20the%20former%27s%20servers%20were%20taken%20down%20permanently%20in%202003%2C%20and%20its%20text%20was%20incorporated%20into%20Wikipedia.%20The%20English%20Wikipedia%20passed%20the%20mark%20of%20two%20million%20articles%20on%20September%209%2C%202007%2C%20making%20it%20the%20largest%20encyclopedia%20ever%20assembled%2C%20surpassing%20even%20the%201408%20Yongle%20Encyclopedia%2C%20which%20had%20held%20the%20record%20for%20almost%20600%20years.%5B37%5D%0A%0ACiting%20fears%20of%20commercial%20advertising%20and%20lack%20of%20control%20in%20Wikipedia%2C%20users%20of%20the%20Spanish%20Wikipedia%20forked%20from%20Wikipedia%20to%20create%20the%20Enciclopedia%20Libre%20in%20February%202002.%5B38%5D%20These%20moves%20encouraged%20Wales%20to%20announce%20that%20Wikipedia%20would%20not%20display%20advertisements%2C%20and%20to%20change%20Wikipedia%27s%20domain%20from%20wikipedia.com%20to%20wikipedia.org.%5B39%5D%0A%0AThough%20the%20English%20Wikipedia%20reached%20three%20million%20articles%20in%20August%202009%2C%20the%20growth%20of%20the%20edition%2C%20in%20terms%20of%20the%20numbers%20of%20articles%20and%20of%20contributors%2C%20appears%20to%20have%20peaked%20around%20early%202007.%5B40%5D%20Around%201%2C800%20articles%20were%20added%20daily%20to%20the%20encyclopedia%20in%202006%3B%20by%202013%20that%20average%20was%20roughly%20800.%5B41%5D%20A%20team%20at%20the%20Palo%20Alto%20Research%20Center%20attributed%20this%20slowing%20of%20growth%20to%20the%20project%27s%20increasing%20exclusivity%20and%20resistance%20to%20change.%5B42%5D%20Others%20suggest%20that%20the%20growth%20is%20flattening%20naturally%20because%20articles%20that%20could%20be%20called%20%22low-hanging%20fruit%22%E2%80%94topics%20that%20clearly%20merit%20an%20article%E2%80%94have%20already%20been%20created%20and%20built%20up%20extensively.%5B43%5D%5B44%5D%5B45%5D%0A%0AIn%20November%202009%2C%20a%20researcher%20at%20the%20Rey%20Juan%20Carlos%20University%20in%20Madrid%20(Spain)%20found%20that%20the%20English%20Wikipedia%20had%20lost%2049%2C000%20editors%20during%20the%20first%20three%20months%20of%202009%3B%20in%20comparison%2C%20the%20project%20lost%20only%204%2C900%20editors%20during%20the%20same%20period%20in%202008.%5B46%5D%5B47%5D%20The%20Wall%20Street%20Journal%20cited%20the%20array%20of%20rules%20applied%20to%20editing%20and%20disputes%20related%20to%20such%20content%20among%20the%20reasons%20for%20this%20trend.%5B48%5D%20Wales%20disputed%20these%20claims%20in%202009%2C%20denying%20the%20decline%20and%20questioning%20the%20methodology%20of%20the%20study.%5B49%5D%20Two%20years%20later%2C%20in%202011%2C%20Wales%20acknowledged%20the%20presence%20of%20a%20slight%20decline%2C%20noting%20a%20decrease%20from%20%22a%20little%20more%20than%2036%2C000%20writers%22%20in%20June%202010%20to%2035%2C800%20in%20June%202011.%20In%20the%20same%20interview%2C%20Wales%20also%20claimed%20the%20number%20of%20editors%20was%20%22stable%20and%20sustainable%22.%5B50%5D%20A%202013%20article%20titled%20%22The%20Decline%20of%20Wikipedia%22%20in%20MIT%27s%20Technology%20Review%20questioned%20this%20claim.%20The%20article%20revealed%20that%20since%202007%2C%20Wikipedia%20had%20lost%20a%20third%20of%20the%20volunteer%20editors%20who%20update%20and%20correct%20the%20online%20encyclopedia%20and%20those%20still%20there%20have%20focused%20increasingly%20on%20minutiae.%5B51%5D%20In%20July%202012%2C%20The%20Atlantic%20reported%20that%20the%20number%20of%20administrators%20is%20also%20in%20decline.%5B52%5D%20In%20the%20November%2025%2C%202013%2C%20issue%20of%20New%20York%20magazine%2C%20Katherine%20Ward%20stated%20%22Wikipedia%2C%20the%20sixth-most-used%20website%2C%20is%20facing%20an%20internal%20crisis%22.%5B53%5D%0A%0A%0A%0AWikipedia%20blackout%20protest%20against%20SOPA%20on%20January%2018%2C%202012%0AFile%3AWikipedia%20Edit%202014.webm%0AA%20promotional%20video%20of%20the%20Wikimedia%20Foundation%20that%20encourages%20viewers%20to%20edit%20Wikipedia%2C%20mostly%20reviewing%202014%20via%20Wikipedia%20content%0AMilestones%5Bedit%20source%5D%0AIn%20January%202007%2C%20Wikipedia%20entered%20for%20the%20first%20time%20the%20top-ten%20list%20of%20the%20most%20popular%20websites%20in%20the%20U.S.%2C%20according%20to%20comScore%20Networks.%20With%2042.9%20million%20unique%20visitors%2C%20Wikipedia%20was%20ranked%20number%209%2C%20surpassing%20The%20New%20York%20Times%20(%2310)%20and%20Apple%20(%2311).%20This%20marked%20a%20significant%20increase%20over%20January%202006%2C%20when%20the%20rank%20was%20number%2033%2C%20with%20Wikipedia%20receiving%20around%2018.3%20million%20unique%20visitors.%5B54%5D%20As%20of%20March%202015%2C%20Wikipedia%20has%20rank%205%5B7%5D%5B55%5D%20among%20websites%20in%20terms%20of%20popularity%20according%20to%20Alexa%20Internet.%20In%202014%2C%20it%20received%208%20billion%20pageviews%20every%20month.%5B56%5D%20On%20February%209%2C%202014%2C%20The%20New%20York%20Times%20reported%20that%20Wikipedia%20has%2018%20billion%20page%20views%20and%20nearly%20500%20million%20unique%20visitors%20a%20month%2C%20%22according%20to%20the%20ratings%20firm%20comScore.%22%5B16%5D%0A%0AOn%20January%2018%2C%202012%2C%20the%20English%20Wikipedia%20participated%20in%20a%20series%20of%20coordinated%20protests%20against%20two%20proposed%20laws%20in%20the%20United%20States%20Congress%E2%80%94the%20Stop%20Online%20Piracy%20Act%20(SOPA)%20and%20the%20PROTECT%20IP%20Act%20(PIPA)%E2%80%94by%20blacking%20out%20its%20pages%20for%2024%20hours.%5B57%5D%20More%20than%20162%20million%20people%20viewed%20the%20blackout%20explanation%20page%20that%20temporarily%20replaced%20Wikipedia%20content.%5B58%5D%5B59%5D%0A%0ALoveland%20and%20Reagle%20argue%20that%2C%20in%20process%2C%20Wikipedia%20follows%20a%20long%20tradition%20of%20historical%20encyclopedias%20that%20accumulated%20improvements%20piecemeal%20through%20%22stigmergic%20accumulation%22.%5B60%5D%5B61%5D%0A%0AOn%20January%2020%2C%202014%2C%20Subodh%20Varma%20reporting%20for%20The%20Economic%20Times%20indicated%20that%20not%20only%20had%20Wikipedia%27s%20growth%20flattened%20but%20that%20it%20has%20%22lost%20nearly%2010%20per%20cent%20of%20its%20page-views%20last%20year.%20That%27s%20a%20decline%20of%20about%202%20billion%20between%20December%202012%20and%20December%202013.%20Its%20most%20popular%20versions%20are%20leading%20the%20slide%3A%20page-views%20of%20the%20English%20Wikipedia%20declined%20by%2012%20per%20cent%2C%20those%20of%20German%20version%20slid%20by%2017%20per%20cent%20and%20the%20Japanese%20version%20lost%209%20per%20cent.%22%5B62%5D%20Varma%20added%20that%2C%20%22While%20Wikipedia%27s%20managers%20think%20that%20this%20could%20be%20due%20to%20errors%20in%20counting%2C%20other%20experts%20feel%20that%20Google%27s%20Knowledge%20Graphs%20project%20launched%20last%20year%20may%20be%20gobbling%20up%20Wikipedia%20users.%22%5B62%5D%20When%20contacted%20on%20this%20matter%2C%20Clay%20Shirky%2C%20associate%20professor%20at%20New%20York%20University%20and%20fellow%20at%20Harvard%27s%20Berkman%20Center%20for%20Internet%20and%20Security%20indicated%20that%20he%20suspected%20much%20of%20the%20page%20view%20decline%20was%20due%20to%20Knowledge%20Graphs%2C%20stating%2C%20%22If%20you%20can%20get%20your%20question%20answered%20from%20the%20search%20page%2C%20you%20don%27t%20need%20to%20click%20%5Bany%20further%5D.%22%5B62%5D%0A%0ABy%20the%20end%20of%20December%202016%2C%20Wikipedia%20was%20ranked%20fifth%20in%20the%20most%20popular%20websites%20globally.%5B63%5D